Main content

Spotlight on complaints and why they matter

30 Jun 2026

A spotlight on complaints and why they matter in health and social care regulation 

This page collates some of our recent activity and posts on complaints.

Over the past few weeks, we have explored why complaints matter in health and social care regulation, the barriers people can face when raising concerns, and how better signposting and listening can help make complaints processes clearer and more accessible.

Introducing the topic

We began the month by introducing complaints as our Hot Topic, highlighting the need to understand the experiences of people who want to raise concerns, the importance of hearing patient voices, and the role of practical resources in supporting better understanding.

What has become apparent during month is: the work to improve how concerns and complaints are raised and acted on must continue. Over the past few weeks, we’ve explored why people don’t always feel able to speak up, the impact complaints can have on staff and services, and how changing expectations, technology and online spaces are reshaping the way concerns or complaints are raised. We’ve also highlighted the need for more compassionate, trauma‑informed approaches, and the importance of breaking down barriers across the system. A clear theme has emerged which echoes the key findings in our research Barriers to complaints: People raise concerns because they want to protect others and improve care. But too often, the process can feel unclear, difficult or unsupported.

What we've shared

During the month we shared:

Recommended reads of the weeks

At the end of each week, we also recommended reading on the subject:

  1. Pulse article outlining key changes that could improve systems, from early resolution and better triage to clearer definitions of complaints and a more proportionate regulatory approach.
  2. Management in Practice article drawing on survey responses from GPs and practice managers, it explores why complaints are increasing in general practice and what this means for workload, staff morale and complaints handling. 
  3. A blog by Professor Louise Wallace, one of the researchers behind the Witness to Harm study into the experience of witnesses in the fitness to practise process. In this blog, Professor Wallace explains why customer and personalised care are not good enough, and why a more compassionate approach to complaints handling is needed.
  4. A joint blog by Rebecca Hilsenrath (Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and Alan Clamp (PSA Chief Executive) explaining more about how barriers can prevent people from raising concerns about health and social care – meaning missed opportunities to learn, improve, and protect the public. 

A focus on Nockolds Healthcare Regulators Complaints Forum

The Healthcare Regulators’ Complaints Forum brings together the UK healthcare regulators to support continual improvement in the handling of feedback, complaints and service concerns across healthcare regulation. Chaired and hosted by Nockolds Resolution, the Forum provides a structured platform for cross‑regulator collaboration, enabling organisations to share insight, develop common approaches and address emerging risks in complaints handling. 

Through its work, the Forum has supported greater consistency in complaint definitions and data capture, strengthened the sharing of complaint trends and good practice, and promoted the development of “learning loop” approaches where insight from complaints informs operational and cultural change. 

For example, regulators have worked collaboratively to align definitions of complaints, feedback and enquiries, enabling more meaningful comparison of data and improved cross‑regulator analysis. 

Recent discussions within the Forum also highlight the scale and complexity of current complaint pressures. One regulator reported 102 additional complaints in a single month following system and policy changes, alongside broader evidence of sustained high complaint volumes and increasing complexity, linked to factors such as international cases and the use of artificial intelligence in complaint submissions. 

Collectively, this cross‑regulatory approach enables complaint and feedback insight to be used more effectively to drive performance improvement, inform regulatory practice, and enhance engagement with the public, professions and stakeholders.